| Original message
| Replies:
|
| smythers1968 
| "Re(1):Heil Furnace Replacement" , posted Mon 21 Apr 19:04  
If the existing furnace is 80% or less and you are replacing it with a 90% I would say yes.
OLD 135K X .80 = 108K btu into house
NEW 120K X .90 = 108K btu into house 115K X .90 = 103.5K btu into house 120K X .80 = 96K btu into house - Might be ok but I don't know your climate.
Good luck
Life lesson #12 Know when not to do it yourself. WOW That Can Hurt!!
|
| | JCMSr | "Re(2):Heil Furnace Replacement" , posted Mon 21 Apr 20:39  
Here's a little more information I discovered after my OP. The existing furnaces' output is actually 106,000 which is approximately 78.5% efficiency. Assuming the new unit operates at 80% efficiency the output would only be 96,000. I have been told that nobody currently makes a package unit with better than 80% efficiency. That would be roughly a 10% reduction in the BTU output and that gives me some cause for concern. Am I over reacting?
|
| | smythers1968 
| "Re(3):Heil Furnace Replacement" , posted Mon 21 Apr 20:53  
I don't think there is a big concern.
I would look into a 2 or 3 stage heat package unit.
Life lesson #12 Know when not to do it yourself. WOW That Can Hurt!!
|
|
|